Guiding questions/tasks & format:
LOCALE: How do tagging patterns differ among rural, urban, and suburban schools?
* table of biggest differences between categories (urban vs. rural; rural vs. suburban; suburban vs. urban)
* odds ratio
* visualization
Data used:
There are 4 schools not included in analysis:
* Horizons Alternative (no NCES/self-reported data)
* Iowa Big (multi-coded locale)
* The Forest Schools (multi-coded locale)
* Link Learning (multi-coded locale)
Variables created:
* n - number of schools that selected tag
* total_tags_locale - total number of tags in given locale category
* pct_school - percentage of schools that selected tag (n/157)
* pct_total_tags - percentage of total tags within each locale (n/total_tags_locale)
The following table and plots present the data within locales as a function of the full dataset.
In other words, the denominator is 157 (161 total schools - 4 schools excluded from analysis either because of either missing or multi-coded data).
As a result, the bar charts are perhaps not easily compared and/or what we were aiming for, something I realized after creating them, but I left them in for us to look at in case there’s any other information they help give us, such as overall distribution of tags.
Note: I haven’t incorporated theming into the plots yet–I need to figure out how to download fonts and work with theming, which I am not super familiar with and ran out of time.
In my second shot at plots, I’ve used tagging within locale as the basis for comparison. In other words, the denominator is equal to the number of schools within the specified locale type (95 urban schools, 32 suburban schools, and 30 rural schools = 157 total schools in analysis). This gives us an idea of the differences in tagging patterns within urban, suburban, and rural areas respectively, but I was hesitant to compare due to differences in sample size which is why I plan to also plot odds ratios in the third iteration of plotting below. Still useful to consider questions like, how much more often did suburban areas implement x practice than rural areas?
Table mainly to show the differences the within locale analysis makes to help conceptualize. (i.e., I needed this table to think through it. Notice Pct. Tags sum in this table = 100% meaning we’re accounting for all tags within each practice and analyzing the distribution across locale within it, as compared to earlier table where Pct. Tags does not equal 100, and reflects percentage of total schools that selected said tag as distributed across locale.)
The biggest difference was shocking to me–68% of urban schools tagged anti-racist practices, compared to only 20% of rural schools (!!). Really curious to see how these top 3 (anti-racist practices, culturally-responsive practices, and hiring for equity and inclusion values) have or have not shifted from previous years.
## [1] "anti-racist practices"
## [2] "hiring for equity and inclusion values"
## [3] "culturally responsive practices"
## [4] "social justice focus"
## [5] "tutoring"
## [6] "Ã la carte model"
## [7] "family & community support services"
## [8] "student-led goal setting"
## [9] "makerspace"
## [10] "real-world problem solving"
In this final analysis, I calculated probability for each practice and converted to odds ratio in order to plot how much more or less likely a given locale was to select each tag.
Save plots:
Guiding questions/tasks & format:
LOCALE: How do tagging patterns differ among rural, urban, and suburban schools?
* viz of smallest differences between categories (urban vs. rural; rural vs. suburban; suburban vs. urban)
* odds ratio modeled